Back to thiazide-diuretics for hypertension: Reflections after a decade of irrational prescribing

11Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Whether newer antihypertensive drugs, such as calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and a blockers are more effective than thiazides and β blockers in preventing coronary disease, has been debated for years. Discussion: Recently several trials addressing this issue have been finalised, and they provide a convincing answer: the newer drugs are no better than the older ones. In the largest trial to date (ALLHAT), thiazide-type diuretic was found to offer advantages over newer drugs. The medical community should now be capable of reaching consensus, and recommend thiazides as the first line therapy for the treatment of hypertension. Prescribing physicians, cardiologists, drug companies and health authorities are all partly responsible for the years of irrational prescribing that we have witnessed. Summary: All stakeholders should now contribute in order to achieve what is clearly in the public's interest: implementing the use of thiazides in clinical practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fretheim, A. (2003, December 23). Back to thiazide-diuretics for hypertension: Reflections after a decade of irrational prescribing. BMC Family Practice. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-4-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free