Empirical Study of Pedestrians’ Characteristics at Bottlenecks

  • Winkens A
  • Rupprecht T
  • Seyfried A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The design procedures of Nelson and Mowrer in the SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering (Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda, MD, NELS) and Predtetchenskii and Milinskii (PM) in Planning for Foot Traffic Flow in Buildings (Amerind, New Dehli PM) are frequently used for capacity analysis of pedestrian facilities, e.g. egress routes. Both agree that congestion occurs in front of a bottleneck, if the incoming flow exceeds the capacity. However, in case of a present congestion in front of a bottleneck, their approaches differ considerably. Nelson assumes that in this case the flow inside a. bottleneck is determined by the bottleneck capacity. PM instead expect that the density in front of the entrance to the bottleneck is significant; higher than the density, which is attributed to the capacity, and thus the flow inside is lower than the capacity. Furthermore PM assume that the density inside is generally significant lower than the density in front of the bottleneck. To resolve these discrepancies we studied the pedestrian flow through a bottleneck (Rupprecht, Diploma thesis, University of Wuppertal, RUPP) as well as the density and the jam occurrence in front of a bottleneck (Winkens, Diploma thesis, University of Wuppertal, WINK) by an experiment performed under laboratory conditions. The aim was to get reliable data concerning the density directly in front of and inside the bottleneck and thereby to check the assumptions of Nelson and Mowrer and Predtetchenskii and Milinskii. We found that during the stationary state the density in front of the bottleneck does not depend on the bottleneck width b for 0.8 m

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Winkens, A., Rupprecht, T., Seyfried, A., & Klingsch, W. (2010). Empirical Study of Pedestrians’ Characteristics at Bottlenecks. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2008 (pp. 263–268). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04504-2_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free