Addressing the ‘leadership conundrum’ through a mixed methods study of school leadership for literacy

5Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper explores methodological insights from a mixed methods study that aims to understand how school leaders promote literacy development in their schools. The study findings consider both the complementarities and the challenges of the qualitative and quantitative approaches to measuring leadership practices and their linkages with learning across schools. We begin by identifying a conundrum in school leadership and management (SLM) research – strong effects found in qualitative studies and weaker effects in quantitative studies. From the literature we identify some of the central challenges that account for these differences. We then show how these challenges were and were not addressed in the mixed method research we conducted in an SLM study of South African primary schools in challenging contexts. We consider why the central aim of the study – to develop a scalable instrument for measuring SLM – remains elusive.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taylor, N., Wills, G., & Hoadley, U. (2019). Addressing the ‘leadership conundrum’ through a mixed methods study of school leadership for literacy. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919828928

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free