Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: A prospective study

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel penile circumcision suturing devices PCSD and Shang ring (SR) for circumcision in an adult population. Materials and Methods: A total of 124 outpatients were randomly assigned to receive PCSD (n=62) or SR (n=62). Patient characteristics, operative time, blood loss, return to normal activities time (RNAT), visual analogue scale (VAS), scar width, wound healing time, cosmetic result, and complications were recorded. Results: There were no significant differences in blood loss, RNAT, or complications between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the VAS scores at the operation, at 6 or 24 hours after surgery (P > 0.05). The wound scar width was wider in the SR group than in the PCSD group (P < 0.01). Patients in the SR group had significantly longer wound healing time compared with those in the PCSD group (P < 0.01). Patients who underwent PCSD were significantly more satisfied with the cosmetic results (P < 0.01). Conclusions: SR and PCSD are safe and effective minimally invasive techniques for adult male circumcision. Compared with SRs, PCSDs have the advantages of faster postoperative incision healing and a good effect on wound cosmetics.