The deity, figured and dis figured: Hume on philosophical theism and vulgar religion

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

David Hume is usually understood as an early modern champion of atheism, having exposed the absence of rational arguments for the existence of God and the presence of irrational factors in the formation of all religious belief. In this essay I intend to develop a more complex picture of Hume. At the beginning of the Natural History of Religion, Hume makes a distinction between genuine theism and vulgar religion. I will argue that Hume rejects the latter, but endorsees the former. To each of these two forms of religion Hume associates a certain model of the deity: one ascertained by the faculty of empirical reason, the other generated by passions deeply rooted in the anxieties of finitude. The model to which one is inclined will depend largely upon one’s ethical profile.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hardy, L. (2013). The deity, figured and dis figured: Hume on philosophical theism and vulgar religion. In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities (pp. 699–707). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_57

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free