This chapter describes and comments on the large qualitative differences between curriculum intentions and outcomes, within and across countries. It is not a meta-analysis of research on international comparisons; rather the focus is the rela- tionship between what a government intends to happen in its society’s mathematics classrooms and what actually does. Is there a mismatch? In most countries there is. Why? This leads us into the dynamics of school systems, in a steady state and when change is intended—and, finally, to what might be done to bring classroom outcomes closer to policy intentions. Two areas are discussed in more detail: prob- lem solving and modeling, and the roles of computer technology in mathematics classrooms.
CITATION STYLE
Fuson, K. C., & Li, Y. (2014). Learning Paths and Learning Supports for Conceptual Addition and Subtraction in the US Common Core State Standards and in the Chinese Standards (pp. 541–558). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_25
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.