A new anterior approach for fluoroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block: A preliminary report

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of fluoroscopy-guided anterior approach for suprascapular nerve block (SSNB). Methods: Twenty patients with chronic shoulder pain were included in the study. All of the nerve blocks were performed with patients in a supine position. Fluoroscopy was tilted medially to obtain the best view of the scapular notch (medial angle) and caudally to put the base of coracoid process and scapular spine on same line (caudal angle). SSNB was performed by introducing a 100-mm, 21-gauge needle to the scapular notch with tunnel view technique. Following negative aspiration, 1.0 ml of contrast was injected to confirm the scapular notch, and 1 % mepivacaine 2 ml was slowly injected. The success of SSNB was assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) before and after the block. Results: The average NRS was decreased from 4.8 ± 0.6 to 0.6 ± 0.5 after the procedure (P < 0.05). The best view of the scapular notch was obtained in a medial angle of 15.1 ± 2.2 (11-19°) and a caudal angle of 15.4 ± 1.7° (12-18°). The average distance from the skin to the scapular notch was 5.8 ± 0.6 cm. None of the complications such as pneumothorax, intravascular injection, and hematoma formation was found except one case of partial brachial plexus block. Conclusions: SSNB by fluoroscopy-guided anterior approach is a feasible technique. The advantage of using a fluoroscopy resulted in an effective block with a small dose of local anesthetics by an accurate placement of a tip of needle in the scapular notch while avoiding pneumothorax. © The Korean Pain Society, 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kang, S. S., Jung, J. W., Song, C. K., Yoon, Y. J., & Shin, K. M. (2012). A new anterior approach for fluoroscopy-guided suprascapular nerve block: A preliminary report. Korean Journal of Pain, 25(3), 168–172. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free