Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Functional results after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are generally good. However, some patients suffer from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may represent a therapeutic alternative in these patients, but little is known about indication and results. The aim of this study was to evaluate incontinence after IPAA and demonstrate SNS feasibility in these patients. Methods: This retrospective study includes patients who received a SNS between 1993 and 2020 for increased stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Proctocolectomy was performed in a two- or three-step approach with ileostomy closure as the last step. Demographic, follow-up data and functional results were obtained from the hospital database. Results: SNS was performed in 23 patients. Median follow-up time after SNS was 6.5 years (min. 4.2–max. 8.8). Two patients were lost to follow-up. The median time from ileostomy closure to SNS implantation was 6 years (min. 0.5–max. 14.5). Continence after SNS improved in 16 patients (69%) with a median St. Marks score for anal incontinence of 19 (min. 4–max. 22) before SNS compared to 4 (0–10) after SNS placement (p = 0.012). In seven patients, SNS therapy was not successful. Conclusion: SNS implantation improves symptoms in over two-thirds of patients suffering from high stool frequency or fecal incontinence after proctocolectomy with IPAA. Awareness of the beneficial effects of SNS should be increased in physicians involved in the management of these patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seifarth, C., Slavova, N., Degro, C., Lehmann, K. S., Kreis, M. E., & Weixler, B. (2021). Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 36(9), 1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-03981-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free