US Swine Industry Stakeholder Perceptions of Precision Livestock Farming Technology: A Q-Methodology Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study used the Q-methodology approach to analyze perceptions of precision livestock farming (PLF) technology held by stakeholders directly or indirectly involved in the US swine industry. To see if stakeholders’ perceptions of PLF changed over time as PLF is a rapidly evolving field, we deliberately followed up with stakeholders we had interviewed 6 months earlier. We identified three distinct points of view: PLF improves farm management, animal welfare, and laborer work conditions; PLF does not solve swine industry problems; PLF has limitations and could lead to data ownership conflict. Stakeholders with in-depth knowledge of PLF technology demonstrated elevated levels of optimism about it, whereas those with a basic understanding were skeptical of PLF claims. Despite holding different PLF views, all stakeholders agreed on the significance of training to enhance PLF usefulness and its eventual adoption. In conclusion, we believe this study’s results hold promise for helping US swine industry stakeholders make better-informed decisions about PLF technology implementation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akinyemi, B. E., Akaichi, F., Siegford, J. M., & Turner, S. P. (2023). US Swine Industry Stakeholder Perceptions of Precision Livestock Farming Technology: A Q-Methodology Study. Animals, 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182930

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free