Biomarkers in Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

  • Mertens M
  • Singh J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We performed a systematic review of all MEDLINE-published studies of biomarkers in arthroplasty. Thirty studies met the inclusion criteria; majority evaluated biomarkers for osteolysis, aseptic prosthetic loosening, and prosthetic infections. Four studies reported an elevated Cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (urine or serum) in patients with osteolysis or aseptic prosthetic loosening when compared to appropriate controls. Two or more studies each found elevated C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-6 in patients with infected prosthetic joints compared to controls. Most other biomarkers were either examined by single studies or had inconsistent or insignificant associations with outcomes. We conclude that the majority of the biomarkers currently lack the evidence to be considered as biomarkers for arthroplasty outcomes. Further studies are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mertens, M. T., & Singh, J. A. (2011). Biomarkers in Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. The Open Orthopaedics Journal, 5(1), 92–105. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001105010092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free