Socioeconomic inequality of diabetes patients’ health care utilization in Denmark

57Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Understanding socioeconomic inequalities in health care is critical for achieving health equity. The aim of this paper is threefold: 1) to quantify inequality in diabetes health care service utilization; 2) to understand determinants of these inequalities in relation to socio-demographic and clinical morbidity factors; and 3) to compare the empirical outcome of using income level and educational level as proxies for Socio Economic Status (SES). Data on the entire Danish population of diabetes patients in 2011 (N = 318,729) were applied. Patients’ unique personal identification number enabled individual patient data from several national registers to be linked. A concentration index approach with decomposition into contributing factors was applied. Differences in diabetes patients’ health care utilization patterns suggest that use of services differ among patients of lower and higher SES, despite the Danish universal health care system. Especially, out-patient services, rehabilitation and specialists in primary care show different utilization patterns according to SES. Comparison of the empirical outcome from using educational level and income level as proxy for patients’ SES indicate important differences in inequality estimates. While income, alike other measures of labor market attachment, to a certain extent is explained by morbidity and thus endogenous, education is more decisive for patients’ ability to take advantage of the more specialized services provided in a universal health care system.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sortsø, C., Lauridsen, J., Emneus, M., Green, A., & Jensen, P. B. (2017). Socioeconomic inequality of diabetes patients’ health care utilization in Denmark. Health Economics Review, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-017-0155-5

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

59%

Researcher 19

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

35%

Social Sciences 12

24%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 9

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 5

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free