We study the impact on strategic voting of tie-breaking by means of considering the order of tied candidates within a random vote. We compare this to another non-deterministic tie-breaking rule where we simply choose candidate uniformly at random. In general, we demonstrate that there is no connection between the computational complexity of computing a manipulating vote with the two different types of tie-breaking. However, we prove that for some scoring rules, the computational complexity of computing a manipulation can increase from polynomial to NP-hard. We also discuss the relationship with the computational complexity of computing a manipulating vote when we ask for a candidate to be the unique winner, or to be among the set of co-winners. Copyright © 2013, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Mattei, N., Narodytska, N., & Walsh, T. (2013). Ties matter: Complexity of manipulation when tie-breaking with a random vote. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2013 (pp. 74–80). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8701
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.