Ties matter: Complexity of manipulation when tie-breaking with a random vote

17Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We study the impact on strategic voting of tie-breaking by means of considering the order of tied candidates within a random vote. We compare this to another non-deterministic tie-breaking rule where we simply choose candidate uniformly at random. In general, we demonstrate that there is no connection between the computational complexity of computing a manipulating vote with the two different types of tie-breaking. However, we prove that for some scoring rules, the computational complexity of computing a manipulation can increase from polynomial to NP-hard. We also discuss the relationship with the computational complexity of computing a manipulating vote when we ask for a candidate to be the unique winner, or to be among the set of co-winners. Copyright © 2013, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (www.aaai.org). All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aziz, H., Gaspers, S., Mattei, N., Narodytska, N., & Walsh, T. (2013). Ties matter: Complexity of manipulation when tie-breaking with a random vote. In Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2013 (pp. 74–80). https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v27i1.8701

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free