Planning for leisure: Time for a radical rethink or just a slight adjustment?

  • Sayce S
  • McIntosh A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Use Class Order (UCO) is an important front-line mechanism for assisting in the aim of planning and controlling land uses. Over time the Order has changed to reflect changing patterns of land-use demand; the last overhaul of the definitions took place in 1987. Under this Order leisure uses are considered to be separate and distinguishable from retail. Since 1987 much has happened in relation to the use of land for leisure. There have been changes in the pattern of trade and growth in leisure parks and mixed-use schemes. These call into question the validity of the current distinction. There is an argument that changes to the UCO should increase the amount of prescription in permitted uses. Conversely, there is the argument that a more market-driven approach is appropriate. The fundamental aims of land use planning are to resolve the conflicts that would result from unfettered market forces and to promote the development of urban areas in line with social and economic policy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sayce, S., & McIntosh, A. (2002). Planning for leisure: Time for a radical rethink or just a slight adjustment? Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 2(3), 254–281. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.rlp.5090214

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free