Ordinary Joe and the AfD: What Lies Beneath It?: A Response to My Critics

13Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Critics of my work have found a negative effect of the social status on the likelihood of someone voting for the AfD. However, these findings do not sufficiently confirm the Modernisation Losers’ thesis that I had formulated and testest in this journal in 2017. The reason is that attitudes towards society vary dependent on social status, and these attitudes have no reference to economic modernisation. When controlling the influence of these attitudes in multivariate analyses, status effects will disappear. One of these attitudes is the rejection of refugees: AfD voters often perceive refugees as competitors for scarce resources and a threat to the cultural homogeneity of German society. This means that the effect of social status on the intention of voting for AfD is mediated by attitudes towards immigration. I find evidence for this thesis in some of the contributions of my critics and in new analyses based on the German Social-Economic Panel (GSOEP). My conclusion is that a policy of redistribution will not be suitable for winning back AfD voters, because it misses the decisive motive for their voting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lengfeld, H. (2018). Ordinary Joe and the AfD: What Lies Beneath It?: A Response to My Critics. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 70(2), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-018-0536-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free