Special reports: Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices

85Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective - To determine the percentages of cattle that are stunned correctly and that vocalize (moo or bellow) when a major meat-buying customer conducts slaughter plant audits. Design - Survey of existing practices. Sample Population - 22 federally inspected slaughter plants. Procedure - The 3 variables evaluated in each slaughter plant were stunning efficacy, insensibility on the bleed rail, and vocalization. Results - Of the 22 slaughter plants, 17 (77%) rendered ≥ 95% of the cattle insensible with a single shot from a captive bolt stunner. Twenty slaughter plants (91%) rendered 100% of the cattle completely insensible before hanging them on the bleed rail. Eighteen of 21 (86%) slaughter plants achieved cattle vocalization scores of ≤ 3%. The mean vocalization score for all slaughter plants was 3.08%. Vocalization ranged from 0.66 to 17%. Conclusions - Results of this study indicate that audits of slaughter plants by major meat-buying customers may motivate the meat industry to improve handling and stunning practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Grandin, T. (2000). Special reports: Effect of animal welfare audits of slaughter plants by a major fast food company on cattle handling and stunning practices. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 216(6), 848–851. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2000.216.848

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free