Impact of introducing anticoagulation-related prescribing guidelines in a hospital setting using academic detailing

15Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: Assess the impact of using academic detailing-assisted guideline roll-out on warfarin initiation, reversal of warfarin overanticoagulation, and uptake of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis across 4 metropolitan teaching hospitals. Methods: Baseline data were collected for 3 months prior to intervention. Prescribers were then informed about the guidelines, including feedback of current hospital performance and the basis for the guidelines. Post-intervention data were collected for 3 months after guideline implementation. Results: Uptake of DVT prophylaxis in medical patients increased from 52.8% to 67.0% (p=0.004). No impact on operative surgical patients was seen, possibly due to the high pre-existing rate of uptake (86.1% vs 84.1%, p=0.7). DVT prophylaxis rates in non-operative surgical patients were similar to medical patients, with similar, but non-significant improvements. The time to reach a stable therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) after warfarin initiation was reduced (p=0.03) as were the number of INR's >4 in the first week of therapy (p=0.03). There were significant improvements in appropriate vitamin K use for warfarin overanticoagulation in patients with an INR above 6 (48% vs 74%, P=0.007), timely follow-up tests (49% vs 62%, p=0.009), and the proportion of next INR's being less than 4 (49% vs 61%, p=0.04). Conclusions: The use of academic detailing to facilitate guideline roll-out had a positive impact on nearly all areas studied. The academic detailing process within the hospital setting was received enthusiastically by prescribers. © 2006 Dove Medical Press Limited. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, G. W., & Adams, R. (2006). Impact of introducing anticoagulation-related prescribing guidelines in a hospital setting using academic detailing. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, 2(3), 309–316. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.2006.2.3.309

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free