Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state

7Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper constructs a theory according to which an intention is not a mental state but an action at a certain developmental stage. I model intention on organic life, and thus intention stands to action as (e.g.) tadpole stands to frog. I then argue for this theory by showing how it overcomes three problems: intending while (1) merely preparing, (2) not taking any steps, and (3) the action is impossible. The problems vanish when we see that not all actions are mature. Just as some frogs (such as tadpoles) are immature frogs, some actions (such as intentions) are immature actions.

References Powered by Scopus

What happens when someone acts?

291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Metaphysics for Freedom

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Knowledge in intention

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Visible Learning: The Sequel: A Synthesis of Over 2,100 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement

95Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rational Powers in Action: Instrumental Rationality and Extended Agency

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intentions, Intending, and Belief: Noninferential Weak Cognitivism

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Russell, D. (2018). Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48(5), 742–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Philosophy 4

80%

Social Sciences 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free