This paper constructs a theory according to which an intention is not a mental state but an action at a certain developmental stage. I model intention on organic life, and thus intention stands to action as (e.g.) tadpole stands to frog. I then argue for this theory by showing how it overcomes three problems: intending while (1) merely preparing, (2) not taking any steps, and (3) the action is impossible. The problems vanish when we see that not all actions are mature. Just as some frogs (such as tadpoles) are immature frogs, some actions (such as intentions) are immature actions.
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
CITATION STYLE
Russell, D. (2018). Intention as action under development: why intention is not a mental state. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 48(5), 742–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2017.1414524