The PINE study: Rationale and design of a randomised comparison of epidural injection of local anaesthetics and steroids versus case-as-usual to prevent postherpetic neuralgia in the elderly [ISRCTN32866390]

23Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is by far the most common complication of herpes zoster (HZ) and one of the most intractable pain disorders. Since PHN is seen most often in the elderly, the number of patients with this disorder is expected to increase in our ageing society. PHN may last for months to years and has a high impact on the quality of life. The results of PHN treatment are rather disappointing. Epidural injection of local anaesthetics and steroids in the acute phase of HZ is a promising therapy for the prevention of PHN. Since randomised trials on the effectiveness of this intervention are lacking, the PINE (Prevention by epidural Injection of postherpetic Neuralgia in the Elderly) study was set up. The PINE study compares the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a single epidural injection of local anaesthetics and steroids during the acute phase of HZ with that of care-as-usual (i.e. antivirals and analgesics) in preventing PHN in elderly patients. Methods/design: The PINE study is an open, multicenter clinical trial in which 550 elderly (age ≥ 50 yr.) patients who consult their general practitioner in the acute phase of HZ (rash < 7 days) are randomised to one of the treatment groups. The primary clinical endpoint is the presence of HZ-related pain one month after the onset of the rash. Secondary endpoints include duration and severity of pain, re-interventions aiming to treat the existing pain, side effects, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness. Conclusion: The PINE study is aimed to quantify the (cost-) effectiveness of a single epidural injection during the acute phase of HZ on the prevention of PHN. © 2004 Opstelten et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (Sf-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection

30891Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EuroQol: The current state of play

4880Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States

3741Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The PINE study of epidural steroids and local anaesthetics to prevent postherpetic neuralgia: A randomised controlled trial

181Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of vaccination against herpes zoster in England and Wales

131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Predicting postherpetic neuralgia in elderly primary care patients with herpes zoster: Prospective prognostic study

97Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Opstelten, W., van Wijck, A. J. M., van Essen, G. A., Buskens, E., Bak, A. A. A., Kalkman, C. J., … Moons, K. G. M. (2004). The PINE study: Rationale and design of a randomised comparison of epidural injection of local anaesthetics and steroids versus case-as-usual to prevent postherpetic neuralgia in the elderly [ISRCTN32866390]. BMC Anesthesiology, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-4-2

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

30%

Researcher 3

15%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

81%

Psychology 2

10%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free