Introduction

0Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The existing, oppositional categories of gender and biological sex are being increasingly challenged in social and cultural life. Intersex communities are pushing for greater self-determination and resisting the medical assignment of ‘ambiguous’ infants to dualistic sex categories (see ISNA 2013; OII 2013). In Australia, Germany, Nepal and elsewhere there are moves towards the expansion of legal sex/gender categories on official documentation, including those which offer a third option (Bibby 2013; Davidson 2014; Knight 2012; Nandi 2013). Facebook has announced the expansion of users’ gender options to an alleged 58 options (Goldman 2014). There is growing grass-roots international interest in truly gender-transcendent childrearing or the withholding of infants’ sex/gender (Green & Friedman 2013; Leonard 2011; Parafianowicz 2009) as well as encouraging ‘gender-free’ toys (Ditum 2012; Orenstein 2011). Some preschools are trying to eliminate gendering (Hebblethwaite 2011) and some countries are introducing gender-neutral pronouns (Bahadur 2013). Androgynous ‘male’ models are modelling ‘women’s’ clothes in fashion magazines and on runways (Morris 2011), and androgynous ‘female’ models are doing the reverse (Peppers 2013).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nicholas, L. (2014). Introduction. In Genders and Sexualities in the Social Sciences (pp. 1–16). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137321626_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free