Real-World Evidence Should Be Used in Regulatory Decisions About New Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Products for Diabetes

34Citations
Citations of this article
109Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are no longer the sole source of data to inform guidelines, regulatory, and policy decisions. Real-world data (RWD), collected from registries, electronic health records, insurance claims, pharmacy records, social media, and sensor outputs from devices form real-world evidence (RWE), which can supplement evidence from RCTs. Benefits of using RWE include less time and cost to produce meaningful data; the ability to capture additional information, including social determinants of health that can impact health outcomes; detection of uncommon adverse events; and the potential to apply machine learning and artificial intelligence to the delivery of health care. Overall, combining data from RCTs and RWE would allow regulators to make ongoing and more evidence-based decisions in approving and monitoring products for diabetes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Klonoff, D. C., Gutierrez, A., Fleming, A., & Kerr, D. (2019, November 1). Real-World Evidence Should Be Used in Regulatory Decisions About New Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Products for Diabetes. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296819839996

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free