Civilized oppression and moral relations victims, fallibility, and the moral community

5Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There are significant differences between civilized oppression and violent oppression and these differences show not only in the phenomena involved, but also in the nature of those who actively contribute to the two phenomena ('contributing agents'). Fair characterizations of the agents of civilized oppression often require very different descriptions from those applying to violent oppressors. Many of the failings behind civilized oppression are shared by both the contributing agents and a large number of the victims. Often it is the privileged social position of the agents that allows those failings to have such a serious impact, whereas the same failings in the victims may be fairly innocuous (though they are not always). This book is alert to this and other differences between civilized and violent oppression. Jean Harvey examines what the moral relations should be between the key players in civilized oppression: the agents, victims, and 'bystanders'.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Harvey, J., & Calcagno, A. (2015). Civilized oppression and moral relations victims, fallibility, and the moral community. Civilized Oppression and Moral Relations Victims, Fallibility, and the Moral Community (pp. 1–199). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137498069

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free