Bronchodilation in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze

34Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Controversy remains regarding the effectiveness of bronchodilators in wheezy infants. Aims: To assess the effect of inhaled β2 agonists on lung function in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze, and to determine whether a negative effect of β2 agonists on forced expiratory flow (V'maxFRC) is more pronounced in infants with airway malacia, compared to infants with wheeze. Methods: We retrospectively analysed lung function data of 27 infants: eight with malacia, 19 with recurrent wheeze. Mean (SD) age was 51 (18) weeks. Mean V'maxFRC (in Z score) was assessed before and after inhalation of β2 agonists. Results: Baseline V'maxFRC was below reference values for both groups. Following inhalation of β2 agonists the mean (95% Cl) change in mean V'maxFRC in Z scores was -0.10 (-0.26 to 0.05) and -0.33 (-0.55 to -0.11) for the malacia and wheeze group, respectively. Conclusions: In infants with wheeze, inhaled β2 agonists caused a significant reduction in mean V'maxFRC. Infants with malacia were not more likely to worsen after β2 agonists than were infants with recurrent wheeze.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hofhuis, W., Van Der Wiel, E. C., Tiddens, H. A. W. M., Brinkhorst, G., Holland, W. P. J., De Jongste, J. C., & Merkus, P. J. F. M. (2003). Bronchodilation in infants with malacia or recurrent wheeze. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 88(3), 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.88.3.246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free