One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

10 days: 31.5% versus 81.0%; P < 0.001) compared with CABG. After the median 21-month follow-up, no significant difference was found in the major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), death, myocardial infarction, repeated revascularization, and stroke rate. Besides, the freedom-from MACCE survival rate was similar between the two groups. One-stop HCR seemed to be a safe and feasible revascularization strategy in patients with MVCAD, with faster recovery and similar outcomes when compared with off-pump CABG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, Y., Zhang, Z., Gao, J., Li, C., Li, K., Su, P., & Wang, L. (2022). One-Stop Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. International Heart Journal, 63(3), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.21-705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free