Analysis of parasitic effects in triple-well CMOS SPDT switch

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A comparison between a conventional body floating single pole double throw (SPDT) CMOS switch design and a proposed switched gate floating CMOS SPDT switch design based on an analysis of parasitic effects is presented. In standard CMOS technology, the switched gate floating switch is analytically proved to have higher isolation owing to the alleviation of parasitic diode and substrate coupling effects in the operation state. The proposed switch maintains a similar insertion loss as conventional swithches while achieving an average of 6 dB isolation improvement over the operating frequency, which agrees well with the presented analysis. © 2013 The Institution of Engineering and Technology.

References Powered by Scopus

Design and analysis for a miniature CMOS SPDT switch using body-floating technique to improve power performance

199Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

15-GHz Fully integrated nMOS switches in a 0.13-μ,m CMOS process

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

16.6- and 28-GHz fully integrated CMOS RF switches with improved body floating

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A 0.5-30GHz wideband differential CMOS T/R switch with independent bias and leakage cancellation techniques

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

40 dB-isolation, 1.85 dB-insertion loss full CMOS SPDT switch with body-floating technique and ultra-small active matching network using on-chip solenoid inductor for BLE applications

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An asymmetrical bulk CMOS switch for 2.4 GHz application

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, P., & Liu, P. (2013). Analysis of parasitic effects in triple-well CMOS SPDT switch. Electronics Letters, 49(11), 706–708. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2013.0945

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 5

83%

Materials Science 1

17%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 29

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free