Long-term survival after lung-sparing total pleurectomy for locally advanced (international mesothelioma interest group stage T3-T4) non-sarcomatoid malignant pleural mesothelioma

Abstract

Objectives: There is a body of opinion that advocates extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) as the only radical treatment option for locally advanced (T3/T4) malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We tested the hypothesis that lung-sparing total pleurectomy (LSTP) can be as effective as EPP in locally advanced MPM with reduced risk. Methods: We analysed prospective data on 165 patients (128 with epithelioid and 37 with biphasic MPM) with pT3 (n = 108) and pT4 (n = 57) tumours. Ninety-eight (59.4%) of the patients underwent EPP and 67 (40.6%) LSTP. We compared intergroup differences in: length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications, survival, pattern of disease progression and disease-free interval (DFI). Results: There were significantly more complications after EPP: 67 (68%) vs. 29 (43%) in LSTP, P = 0.002. Thirty-day mortality was 7% for EPP and 3% for LSTP (P = 0.31). LOS was similar (mean 19 days for EPP, 15 days for LSTP, P = 0.19). We noted only minor differences in the initial site of disease progression. In 33 (41%) of EPP patients, disease progressed locally compared with 22 (44%) after LSTP. Seventeen patients post-EPP (21%) had distal progression compared with only three (6%) post-LSTP and synchronous distal and local recurrence was similar: 15 (19%) post-EPP vs. 12% for LSTP (P = 0.11). There was no significant intergroup difference in median survival: EPP 14.7 months (SE 1.3, 95% CI 12.2-17.2) vs. LSTP 13.4 months (SE 1.9, 95% CI 9.7-17.1), P = 0.91, nor in DFI: EPP 10.7 months (SE 0.8, 95% CI 9-12) vs. LSTP 16 months (SE 1, 95% CI 9-22). In chemonaive patients (n = 124), adjuvant chemotherapy was received by significantly more patients after LSTP (32/53 LSTP vs. 26/71 EPP patients, P = 0.011). Estimated 1-5 years survival for EPP was 58, 30, 11, 9 and 6% and for LSTP 52, 28, 20, 13 and 4%. Conclusions: In disagreement with standard opinion, we advocate LSTP as the procedure of choice in locally advanced MPM: it offers at least equally as good oncological results as EPP in this group of patients with reduced early complications. Despite a tendency for increased local recurrence in the LSTP group, overall survival is not compromised. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.