The effect of steps to promote higher levels of farm animal welfare across the EU. societal versus animal scientists' perceptions of animal welfare

29Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Information about animal welfare standards and initiatives from eight European countries was collected, grouped, and compared to EU welfare standards to detect those aspects beyond minimum welfare levels demanded by EU welfare legislation. Literature was reviewed to determine the scientific relevance of standards and initiatives, and those aspects going beyond minimum EU standards. Standards and initiatives were assessed to determine their strengths and weaknesses regarding animal welfare. Attitudes of stakeholders in the improvement of animal welfare were determined through a Policy Delphi exercise. Social perception of animal welfare, economic implications of upraising welfare levels, and differences between countries were considered. Literature review revealed that on-farm space allowance, climate control, and environmental enrichment are relevant for all animal categories. Experts' assessment revealed that on-farm prevention of thermal stress, air quality, and races and passageways' design were not sufficiently included. Stakeholders considered that housing conditions are particularly relevant regarding animal welfare, and that animal-based and farm-level indicators are fundamental to monitor the progress of animal welfare. The most notable differences between what society offers and what farm animals are likely to need are related to transportation and space availability, with economic constraints being the most plausible explanation. © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Averós, X., Aparicio, M. A., Ferrari, P., Guy, J. H., Hubbard, C., Schmid, O., … Spoolder, H. A. M. (2013). The effect of steps to promote higher levels of farm animal welfare across the EU. societal versus animal scientists’ perceptions of animal welfare. Animals, 3(3), 786–807. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3030786

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free