Discourse, interaction and spatial rhythms: Locating pedagogic practice in a material world

14Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article draws on Lefebvre's rhythmanalysis to interrogate and extend Bernstein's theory of pedagogic framing. It develops a typology of modes of pedagogic practice differentiated in terms of the dominance of one of three potential organising referents. These are (a) the grammar of the instructional discourse configured by a regulative discourse, (b) conventions or models of practice circulated within, or generated through participation in, a practice community, and (c) habituated coordinations of contextual time/space and technology use as practice rhythms. The typology constitutes an analytic frame for classroom observation data drawn from a study conducted in two schools. On a theoretical level, the study concludes that pedagogy is a hybrid practice involving a variable and contingent relationship between its three organising referents: discourse, conventions or models within a practice community, and space/time technology practices. © 2004 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jacklin, H. (2004). Discourse, interaction and spatial rhythms: Locating pedagogic practice in a material world. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681360400200208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free