Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias

19Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

People use information about the covariation between a putative cause and an outcome to determine whether a causal relationship obtains. When there are two candidate causes and one is more strongly related to the effect than is the other, the influence of the second is underestimated. This phenomenon is called causal discounting. In two experiments, we adapted paradigms for studying causal learning in order to apply signal detection analysis to this phenomenon. We investigated whether the presence of a stronger alternative makes the task more difficult (indexed by differences in d′) or whether people change the standard by which they assess causality (measured by β). Our results indicate that the effect is due to bias. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laux, J. P., Goedert, K. M., & Markman, A. B. (2010). Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17(2), 213–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.2.213

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free