Impact of spore biology on the rate of kill and suppression of resistance in Bacillus anthracis

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Bacillus anthracis is complex because of its spore form. The spore is invulnerable to antibiotic action. It also has an impact on the emergence of resistance. We employed the hollow-fiber infection model to study the impacts of different doses and schedules of moxifloxacin on the total-organism population, the spore population, and the subpopulations of vegetative- and spore-phase organisms that were resistant to moxifloxacin. We then generated a mathematical model of the impact of moxifloxacin, administered by continuous infusion or once daily, on vegetative- and spore-phase organisms. The ratio of the rate constant for vegetative-phase cells going to spore phase (Kvs) to the rate constant for spore-phase cells going to vegetative phase (Kvs) determines the rate of organism clearance. The continuous-infusion drug profile is more easily sensed as a threat; the Kvs/Kvs ratio increases at lower drug exposures (possibly related to quorum sensing). This movement to spore phase protects the organism but makes the emergence of resistance less likely. Suppression of resistance requires a higher level of drug exposure with once-daily administration than with a continuous infusion, a difference that is related to vegetative-to-spore (and back) transitioning. Spore biology has a major impact on drug therapy and resistance suppression. These findings explain why all drugs of different classes have approximately the same rate of organism clearance for Bacillus anthracis. Copyright © 2009, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Drusano, G. L., Okusanya, O. O., Okusanya, A. O., Van Scoy, B., Brown, D. L., Fregeau, C., … Louie, A. (2009). Impact of spore biology on the rate of kill and suppression of resistance in Bacillus anthracis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 53(11), 4718–4725. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00802-09

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free