Sensitivity, specificity, and public-health utility of clinical case definitions based on the signs and symptoms of cholera in Africa

12Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

During 2014, Africa reported more than half of the global suspected cholera cases. Based on the data collected from seven countries in the African Cholera Surveillance Network (Africhol), we assessed the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of clinical cholera case definitions, including that recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) using culture confirmation as the gold standard. The study was designed to assess results in real-world field situations in settings with recent cholera outbreaks or endemicity. From June 2011 to July 2015, a total of 5,084 persons with suspected cholera were tested for Vibrio cholerae in seven different countries of which 35.7% had culture confirmation. For all countries combined, the WHO case definition had a sensitivity = 92.7%, specificity = 8.1%, positive predictive value = 36.1%, and negative predictive value = 66.6%. Adding dehydration, vomiting, or rice water stools to the case definition could increase the specificity without a substantial decrease in sensitivity. Future studies could further refine our findings primarily by using more sensitive methods for cholera confirmation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nadri, J., Sauvageot, D., Njanpop-Lafourcade, B. M., Baltazar, C. S., Kere, A. B., Bwire, G., … Gessner, B. D. (2018). Sensitivity, specificity, and public-health utility of clinical case definitions based on the signs and symptoms of cholera in Africa. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 98(4), 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.16-0523

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free