Could CCI or FBCI fully eliminate the impact of curve flexibility when evaluating the surgery outcome for thoracic curve idiopathic scoliosis patient? A retrospective study

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To clarify if CCI or FBCI could fully eliminate the influence of curve flexibility on the coronal correction rate. Methods: We reviewed medical record of all thoracic curve AIS cases undergoing posterior spinal fusion with all pedicle screw systems from June 2011 to July 2013. Radiographical data was collected and calculated. Student t test, Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: 60 were included in this study. The mean age was 14.7y (10-18y) with 10 males (17%) and 50 females (83%). The average Risser sign was 2.7. The mean thoracic Cobb angle before operation was 51.9°. The mean bending Cobb angle was 27.6° and the mean fulcrum bending Cobb angle was 17.4°. The mean Cobb angle at 2 week after surgery was 16.3°. The Pearson correlation coefficient r between CCI and BFR was -0.856(P<0.001), and between FBCI and FFR was -0.728 (P<0.001). A modified FBCI (M-FBCI) = (CR-0.513)/BFR or a modified CCI (M-CCI) = (CR-0.279)/FFR was generated by curve estimation has no significant correlation with FFR (r=-0.08, p=0.950) or with BFR (r=0.123, p=0.349). Conclusions: Fulcrum-bending radiographs may better predict the outcome of AIS coronal correction than bending radiographs in thoracic curveAIS patients. Neither CCI nor FBCI can fully eliminate the impact of curve flexibility on the outcome of correction. A modified CCI or FBCI can better evaluating the corrective effects of different surgical techniques or instruments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, C., Sun, X., Li, C., Ni, H., Zhu, X., Yang, S., & Li, M. (2015). Could CCI or FBCI fully eliminate the impact of curve flexibility when evaluating the surgery outcome for thoracic curve idiopathic scoliosis patient? A retrospective study. PLoS ONE, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126380

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free