Do barriers to candidacy reduce political competition? Evidence from a bachelor's degree requirement for legislators in Pakistan

12Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In the 2002 election, candidates for Pakistan's federal legislature had to possess at least a bachelor's degree. This policy disqualified 60 out of the 207 incumbent legislators from running for election again. Using a difference-in-differences approach with panel data on all electoral constituencies in Pakistan, I find that this ballot access restriction does not affect political competition across all constituencies with disqualified incumbents equally. Stronger political competition is defined as a larger number of candidates contesting election, a smaller vote share and vote margin for the winning candidate, and a less concentrated candidate field, as measured by a Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI) of vote shares. Competition declined significantly in constituencies where the disqualified incumbent belonged to a small party and where literacy levels were lower (signifying a smaller pool of substitute candidates). However, political competition increased in areas where the disqualified incumbent was stronger in terms of his winning vote margin. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Afzal, M. (2014). Do barriers to candidacy reduce political competition? Evidence from a bachelor’s degree requirement for legislators in Pakistan. Public Choice, 161(1–2), 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-013-0126-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free