Design methods are claimed to support designers but, although they are largely taught in academia, their industrial uptake is still lacking. Many reasons have been identified about this flaw and some potential suggestions have been proposed and discussed in literature to overcome the problem. However, a further evidence is that although many students learn such methods from years, they partially or totally abandon the learned methods in their professional careers. This could partially explain the gap between academic and industrial diffusion of design methods. Literature provides suggestions for improving the learning experience of students but different didactical contexts may need more tailored solutions. The work shown in this paper exploits the problem solving potentialities of the TRIZ toolset to provide hints for improving a course focused on teaching a systematic conceptual design method. A set of suggestions has been obtained together some guidelines for applying the considered TRIZ tools to other didactical contexts.
CITATION STYLE
Fiorineschi, L., Frillici, F. S., & Rotini, F. (2019). Teaching and learning design methods: Facing the related issues with TRIZ. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 589–598). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsi.2019.63
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.