Combination of an allogenic and a xenogenic bone substitute material with injectable platelet-rich fibrin – A comparative in vitro study

44Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of the in vitro study was a comparison of an allogenic (ABSM) and a xenogenic bone substitute material (XBSM) with and without injectable platelet-rich fibrin (ABSM-i-PRF & XBSM-i-PRF) on cell characteristics of human osteoblasts (HOB). Here, ABSM and XBSM (+ i-PRF = test; - i-PRF = control) were incubated with HOB for 3, 7 and 10 days. HOB viability, migration, proliferation and differentiation (RT-PCR on alkaline phosphatase (AP), bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and osteonectin (OCN)) were measured and compared between groups. At day 3, an increased viability, migration and proliferation was seen for ABSM-i-PRF. For viability and proliferation (days 7 and 10) and for migration (day 10), ABSM-i-PRF/XBSM-i-PRF showed higher values compared to ABSM/XBSM with maximum values for ABSM-i-PRF and minimum values for XBSM. At days 3 and 7, the highest expression of AP was detected in ABSM-i-PRF/XBSM-i-PRF when compared to ABSM/XBSM, whereas at day 10, AP expression levels were elevated in ABSM-i-PRF/ABSM. The highest BMP-2 expression was seen in ABSM-i-PRF whereas OCN expression showed higher levels in ABSM-i-PRF/XBSM-i-PRF at days 3 and 7 with lowest expression for ABSM. Later on, elevated OC levels were detected for ABSM-i-PRF only. In conclusion, i-PRF in combination with ABSM enhances HOB activity when compared to XBSM-i-PRF or untreated BSM in vitro. Therefore, addition of i-PRF to ABSM and – to a lower extent – to XBSM may influence osteoblast activity in vivo.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyyak, S., Blatt, S., Pabst, A., Thiem, D., Al-Nawas, B., & Kämmerer, P. W. (2020). Combination of an allogenic and a xenogenic bone substitute material with injectable platelet-rich fibrin – A comparative in vitro study. Journal of Biomaterials Applications, 35(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328220914407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free