Setting priorities in health care organizations: Criteria, processes, and parameters of success

105Citations
Citations of this article
166Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Hospitals and regional health authorities must set priorities in the face of resource constraints. Decision-makers seek practical ways to set priorities fairly in strategic planning, but find limited guidance from the literature. Very little has been reported from the perspective of Board members and senior managers about what criteria, processes and parameters of success they would use to set priorities fairly. Discussion: We facilitated workshops for board members and senior leadership at three health care organizations to assist them in developing a strategy for fair priority setting. Workshop participants identified 8 priority setting criteria, 10 key priority setting process elements, and 6 parameters of success that they would use to set priorities in their organizations. Decision-makers in other organizations can draw lessons from these findings to enhance the fairness of their priority setting decision-making. Summary: Lessons learned in three workshops fill an important gap in the literature about what criteria, processes, and parameters of success Board members and senior managers would use to set priorities fairly. © 2004 Gibson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gibson, J. L., Martin, D. K., & Singer, P. A. (2004, September 8). Setting priorities in health care organizations: Criteria, processes, and parameters of success. BMC Health Services Research. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free