Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation

10Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article critiques equality regulation within neoliberal policy regimes and suggests an alternative. We argue that, globally, neoliberal regimes exacerbate social divisions by individualising responsibilities for addressing inequalities. Consequentially, a new policy direction for equality regulation is required. Using the UK economy as an exemplar, we make the case for relational responsibilisation, which involves raising awareness of workplace inequalities on an international basis; attributing responsibility for inequalities onto specific socioeconomic causes and institutions; and systematically developing policies and practices that extend accountability for and ameliorate the negative consequences of workplace inequalities. Theoretically, Bourdieusian social critique and realist sociological imagination are used to conceive responsibilisation in relational terms and to imagine a policy agenda that might make societies more responsible for tackling the forms of inequality they produce. Our overall argument is for the creation of a new equality, diversity and inclusion-aware form of social democracy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vincent, S., Lopes, A., Meliou, E., & Özbilgin, M. (2024). Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation. Work, Employment and Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231217660

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free