Management of malignant colonic polyps: A population-based analysis of colonoscopic polypectomy versus surgery

50Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of colon polyps containing invasive carcinoma includes surgical resection or colonoscopic polypectomy. To date, there are very limited population-based data comparing outcomes with the 2 management approaches. METHODS: Using the linked Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database, we identified 2077 patients aged ≤yen;66 years with an initial diagnosis of stage T1N0M0 malignant polyp from 1992-2005. Patients were categorized as surgical or polypectomy depending on the most invasive treatment. To adjust for potential selection bias in treatment assignment, using multivariate analysis, patients were divided into quintiles of likelihood of polypectomy (propensity scores), and outcomes were compared in each quintile. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 1340 (64.5%) patients and polypectomy was performed in 737 (35.5%) patients. Predictors for undergoing polypectomy (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooper, G. S., Xu, F., Barnholtz Sloan, J. S., Koroukian, S. M., & Schluchter, M. D. (2012). Management of malignant colonic polyps: A population-based analysis of colonoscopic polypectomy versus surgery. Cancer, 118(3), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26340

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free