Carotid artery stenting: Current and emerging options

23Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Carotid artery stenting technologies are rapidly evolving. Options for endovascular surgeons and interventionists who treat occlusive carotid disease continue to expand. We here present an update and overview of carotid stenting devices. Evidence supporting carotid stenting includes randomized controlled trials that compare endovascular stenting to open surgical endarterectomy. Carotid technologies addressed include the carotid stents themselves as well as adjunct neuroprotective devices. Aspects of stent technology include bare-metal versus covered stents, stent tapering, and free-cell area. Drug-eluting and cutting balloon indications are described. Embolization protection options and new direct carotid access strategies are reviewed. Adjunct technologies, such as intravascular ultrasound imaging and risk stratification algorithms, are discussed. Bare-metal and covered stents provide unique advantages and disadvantages. Stent tapering may allow for a more fitted contour to the caliber decrement between the common carotid and internal carotid arteries but also introduces new technical challenges. Studies regarding free-cell area are conflicting with respect to benefits and associated risk; clinical relevance of associated adverse effects associated with either type is unclear. Embolization protection strategies include distal filter protection and flow reversal. Though flow reversal was initially met with some skepticism, it has gained wider acceptance and may provide the advantage of not crossing the carotid lesion before protection is established. New direct carotid access techniques address difficult anatomy and incorporate sophisticated flow-reversal embolization protection techniques. Carotid stenting is a new and exciting field with rapidly advancing technologies. Embolization protection, low-risk deployment, and lesion assessment and stratification are active areas of research. Ample room remains for further innovations and developments.

References Powered by Scopus

Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis

8300Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis

3246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients

2686Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Patients with carotid atherosclerosis who underwent or did not undergo carotid endarterectomy: Outcome on mood, cognition and quality of life

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of Open- vs Closed-Cell Stent Design on Periprocedural Outcomes and Restenosis After Carotid Artery Stenting: A Systematic Review and Comprehensive Meta-analysis

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Morphometry of the entire internal carotid artery on ct angiography

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morr, S., Lin, N., & Siddiqui, A. H. (2014, October 20). Carotid artery stenting: Current and emerging options. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S46044

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

62%

Researcher 9

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

65%

Engineering 6

19%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free