Relationship between shoot and root of woody species of phenological functional groups of dry forest

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Water availability in arid and semi-arid environments is the most limiting environmental factor for the development of plants, which use different mechanisms to capture the water from the soil. The objective of this work was to evaluate if there is differential allocation of resources between root and shoot of woody species of Brazilian dry forest and its relationship with the phenological functional groups of known adult woody: evergreen (EG), deciduous high density woody species (DHDW) and deciduous low density woody species (DLDW). The experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with a duration of six months, with plans submitted to two treatments: controlled irrigation (CI) and abundant irrigation (AI). Results showed that there was no interaction between phenological groups and applied treatments. However, the treatment with AI presented values of total biomass higher than those presented by CI. Fine root biomass was the only variable that did not differ between abundant irrigation and controlled irrigation. DLDW plants had higher root: shoot ratio compared to DHDW and EG. DLDW presented a differentiated strategy, being an indicative factor of these groups high thick root biomass, followed by low fine root biomass, with lower proportion of leaf biomass, and higher total biomass. These results show that CI reduces the development of seedlings in the groups and hence they invest in fine-root biomass. DLDW species presented higher investment in root biomass than in shoot, in addition to higher values of total biomass and specific leaf area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azevêdo, T. K. B., Carnaval, A. A. A., Silva, B. R. F., Ucellafilho, J. G. M., Sampaio, E. V. S. B., Pimenta, A. S., & Rodal, M. J. N. (2020). Relationship between shoot and root of woody species of phenological functional groups of dry forest. Bosque, 41(3), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002020000300345

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free