Olympic Games: Legacy versus Delivery

  • Vadiati N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter addresses the inherent and symptomatic tension within mega-events between the uncompromising imperative of efficient project delivery (the deadline of delivering Olympic Games is non-negotiable) and the claims that the regeneration of some of the most deprived neighbourhoods will be catalysed in the name of legacy. Essentially, exposing legacy to the discussion of 'right to the city' is an urbanistic effort to 'de-alienate' mega-events, as a massive urban intervention, from the citizens. The understanding of the nature of Mega-events as an urban phenomenon with dual commitments helps us to understand the 2012 Olympic Games in its urban context. London Olympic Games 2012 is a Mega-event with its legacy commitment (inclusion, sustainability and transparency) on the one hand and delivery (management efficiency, and major-projects experts) on the other.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vadiati, N. (2020). Olympic Games: Legacy versus Delivery. In The Employment Legacy of the 2012 Olympic Games (pp. 19–32). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0598-0_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free