One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP*) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery

166Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of the study was a comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. Utilizing robotic technology a robot has been designed specifically for the purpose of holding and manoeuvring the laparoscope under the direct control of the surgeon. We tested AESOP (automated endoscopic system for optimal positioning) in 50 patients undergoing routine gynaecological endoscopic surgical procedures. The elimination of the camera holder allows two doctors to perform complex laparoscopic surgery faster than without the robotic arm. The timing of surgical procedures performed by surgeons using the voice control was compared to the timing of similar operations using the foot or hand control. The voice-controlled AESOP works more efficiently and faster than the hand or foot control.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mettler, L., Ibrahim, M., & Jonat, W. (1998). One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP*) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Human Reproduction, 13(10), 2748–2750. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.10.2748

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free