Comparison of non solvable problem solving principles issued from CSP and TRIZ

12Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Inventive problems from many domains are usually problems we are not able to solve. This problem insolvability is often due to the incomplete or unmatched representation model of the problem that does not correspond to the given problem. In this paper, we introduce two problem solving theories for the solutionless problems: Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) and dialectical based methods and models (TRIZ). It is an exploratory analysis of both theories in order to compare grounding approach and tools of both theories. Their potential complementarities will be defined in further objective to improve problem solving strategy for the inventive problems by matching the CSP and TRIZ solving principles. We consider that it will contribute to better understanding of non-solvable problems, i.e. to improve representation models of the problems and to make the problem solving more accurately. © 2008 International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dubois, S., Rasovska, I., & Guio, R. (2008). Comparison of non solvable problem solving principles issued from CSP and TRIZ. In IFIP International Federation for Information Processing (Vol. 277, pp. 83–94). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09697-1_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free