SHIP prevents lipopolysaccharide from triggering an antiviral response in mice

37Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Gram-negative bacterial infections, unlike viral infections, do not typically protect against subsequent viral infections. This is puzzling given that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and double-stranded (ds) RNA both activate the TIR domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon β (TRIF) pathway and, thus, are both capable of eliciting an antiviral response by stimulating type I interferon (IFN) production. We demonstrate herein that SH2-containing inositol-5'-phosphatase (SHIP) protein levels are dramatically increased in murine macrophages via the MyD88-dependent pathway, by up-regulating autocrine-acting transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ). The increased SHIP then mediates, via inhibition of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway, cytosine-phosphate-guanosine (CPG)-and LPS-induced tolerance and cross-tolerance and restrains IFN-β production induced by a subsequent exposure to LPS or dsRNA. Intriguingly, we found, using isoform-specific PI3K inhibitors, that LPS-or cytosine-phosphate-guanosine-induced interleukin-6 (IL-6) is positively regulated by p110α-γ, and-δ but negatively regulated by p110β. This may explain some of the controversy concerning the role of PI3K in Tolllike receptor-induced cytokine production. Consistent with our in vitro findings, SHIP-'-mice overproduce IFN-p in response to LPS, and this leads to antiviral hypothermia. Thus, up-regulation of SHIP in response to Gram-negative bacterial infections probably explains the inability of such infections to protect against subsequent viral infections. © 2009 by The American Society of Hematology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sly, L. M., Hamilton, M. J., Kuroda, E., Ho, V. W., Antignano, F. L., Omeis, S. L., … Krystal, G. (2009). SHIP prevents lipopolysaccharide from triggering an antiviral response in mice. Blood, 113(13), 2945–2954. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-06-166082

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free