Is Cardioprotection Dead?

58Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For >4 decades, the holy grail in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been the mitigation of lethal injury. Despite promising initial results and decades of investigation by the cardiology research community, the only treatment with proven efficacy is early reperfusion of the occluded coronary artery. The remarkable record of failure has led us and others to wonder if cardioprotection is dead. The path to translation, like the ascent to Everest, is certainly littered with corpses. We do, however, highlight a therapeutic principle that provides a glimmer of hope: cellular postconditioning. Administration of cardiosphere-derived cells after reperfusion limits infarct size measured acutely, while providing long-term structural and functional benefits. The recognition that cell therapy may be cardioprotective, and not just regenerative, merits further exploration before we abandon the pursuit entirely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lefer, D. J., & Marbán, E. (2017, July 4). Is Cardioprotection Dead? Circulation. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.027039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free