MNet: A framework to reduce fruit image misclassification

22Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Fast and accurate fruit classification is a major problem in the farming business. To achieve the same, the most popular technique used to build a classification model is “Transfer Learning”, in which the weights of pretrained models are used in a new model to solve different but related problems. This technique assures the fast model building with a reduction in generalization error. After testing a popular image classification models namely, DenseNet161, InceptionV3, and MobileNetV2 on created dataset in which a “misclassification” is observed as a major problem which is overlooked by many researchers. This paper proposed a novel framework called “MNet: Merged Net” which not only improves the accuracy, but also addresses the misclassification problem. In this framework, the fruit classification problem is divided into small problems and build a separate model for each. In the final stage, the results of these models are combined. Two models called as FC_InceptionV3 (Fruit Classification InceptionV3) and MFC_InceptionV3 (Merged Fruit Classification InceptionV3) are created based on popular pretrained model InceptionV3. MFC_InceptionV3 is based on proposed framework. In this work, a dataset consisting of 12000 color images of top fruits in India with “Good” and “Bad” quality labels was created and published. The dataset consists of a total of 12 classes. The proposed framework MNet is tested on the most popular deep learning model called InceptionV3. The results of InceptionV3, FC_InceptionV3, and MFC_InceptionV3 are compared. The experimental results shows that the MFC_InceptionV3 model achieved 99.92% accuracy and moderates the image misclassification problem.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meshram, V. A., Patil, K., & Ramteke, S. D. (2021). MNet: A framework to reduce fruit image misclassification. Ingenierie Des Systemes d’Information, 26(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.260203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free