Debating the Place of Knowledge Within Geography Education: Reinstatement, Reclamation or Recovery?

9Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explores the recent debates about knowledge among sociologists in education, subsequently narrowing its focus to consider the response to such debates from within the geography education community. It starts by reflecting on the development of ideas about both the place and function of knowledge in schools towards the end of the last century, drawing in turn on the social constructivist and social realist positions adopted by Michael Young, and others. After considering Young and Muller’s concepts of Future 1, 2 and 3 curricula the chapter concludes by pursuing the connection between the theoretical conceptions of powerful knowledge, different models of curricular futures and geography education. It is apparent that for many geography educationists the importance of the connection between powerful knowledge and ‘everyday’ knowledge in the school curriculum is not yet successfully articulated in the geography curriculum.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butt, G. (2017). Debating the Place of Knowledge Within Geography Education: Reinstatement, Reclamation or Recovery? In International Perspectives on Geographical Education (pp. 13–26). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49986-4_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free