Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: Follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial

54Citations
Citations of this article
75Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: The COMPARE trial showed a small but significant beneficial effect of 3-year losartan treatment on aortic root dilatation rate in adults with Marfan syndrome (MFS). However, no significant effect was found on clinical endpoints, possibly due to a short follow-up period. The aim of the current study was therefore to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes after losartan treatment. Methods and results: In the original COMPARE study (inclusion 2008-2009), adult patients with MFS (n = 233) were randomly allocated to either the angiotensin-II receptor blocker losartanVR on top of regular treatment (b-blockers in 71% of the patients) or no additional medication. After the COMPARE trial period of 3 years, study subjects chose to continue their losartan medication or not. In a median follow-up period of 8 years, 75 patients continued losartan medication, whereas 78 patients, originally allocated to the control group, never used losartan after inclusion. No differences existed between baseline characteristics of the two groups except for age at inclusion [losartan 34 (interquartile range, IQR 26-43) years, control 41 (IQR 30-52) years; P = 0.031], and b-blocker use (losartan 81%, control 64%; P = 0.022). A pathological FBN1 mutation was present in 76% of patients and 58% of the patients were male. Clinical endpoints, defined as all-cause mortality, aortic dissection/rupture, elective aortic root replacement, reoperation, and vascular graft implantation beyond the aortic root, were compared between the two groups. A perpatient composite endpoint was also analysed. Five deaths, 14 aortic dissections, 23 aortic root replacements, 3 reoperations, and 3 vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root occurred during follow-up. Except for aortic root replacement, all endpoints occurred in patients with an operated aortic root. Patients who used losartan during the entire follow-up period showed a reduced number of events compared to the control group (death: 0 vs. 5, P = 0.014; aortic dissection: 3 vs. 11, P = 0.013; elective aortic root replacement: 10 vs. 13, P = 0.264; reoperation: 1 vs. 2, P = 0.463; vascular graft implantations beyond the aortic root 0 vs. 3, P = 0.071; and composite endpoint: 14 vs. 26, P = 0.019). These results remained similar when corrected for age and b-blocker use in a multivariate analysis. Conclusion: These results suggest a clinical benefit of combined losartan and b-blocker treatment in patients with MFS.

References Powered by Scopus

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

11365Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Losartan, an AT1 antagonist, prevents aortic aneurysm in a mouse model of Marfan syndrome

1519Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Progression of aortic dilatation and the benefit of long-term β-adrenergic blockade in marfan's syndrome

947Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Acute Aortic Syndrome Revisited: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

87Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Repurposing drugs to treat cardiovascular disease in the era of precision medicine

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Angiotensin AT<inf>2</inf> Receptor: Froma Binding Site to a Novel Therapeutic Target

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Andel, M. M., Indrakusuma, R., Jalalzadeh, H., Balm, R., Timmermans, J., Scholte, A. J., … Groenink, M. (2020). Long-term clinical outcomes of losartan in patients with Marfan syndrome: Follow-up of the multicentre randomized controlled COMPARE trial. European Heart Journal, 41(43), 4181–4187. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa377

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

47%

Researcher 13

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

63%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 10

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

7%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free