Urban dispersion modeling: Comparison with single-building measurements

7Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Two models have been developed to predict airflow and dispersion in urban environments. The first model, the Realistic Urban Spread and Transport of Intrusive Contaminants (RUSTIC) model, is a fast-running urban airflow code that rapidly converges to a numerical solution of a modified set of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. RUSTIC uses the k-ω turbulence model with a buoyancy production term to handle atmospheric stability effects. The second model, "MESO," is a Lagrangian particle transport and dispersion code that predicts concentrations of a released chemical or biological agent in urban or rural areas. As a preliminary validation of the models, concentrations simulated by MESO are compared with experimental data from wind-tunnel testing of dispersion around both a multistory rectangular building and a single-story L-shaped building. For the rectangular building, trace gas is forced out at the base of the downwind side, whereas for the L-shaped building, trace gas is forced out of a side door in the inner corner of the "L." The MESO-RUSTIC combination is set up with the initial conditions of the wind-tunnel experiment, and the steady-state concentrations simulated by the models are compared with the wind-tunnel data. For the multistory building, a dense set of detector locations was available downwind at ground level. For the L-shaped building, concentration data were available at three heights in a lateral plane at a distance of one building height downwind of the lee side. A favorable comparison between model simulations and test data is shown for both buildings. © 2007 American Meteorological Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diehl, S. R., Burrows, D. A., Hendricks, E. A., & Keith, R. (2007). Urban dispersion modeling: Comparison with single-building measurements. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46(12), 2180–2191. https://doi.org/10.1175/2006JAMC1300.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free