Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants: Review

57Citations
Citations of this article
101Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to review the published literature to evaluate treatment success with zygomatic implants in patients with atrophic posterior maxilla. Studies from 1987 to 2010 were reviewed. In each study, the following were assessed: indications for treatment, number of patients, number of implants, length and diameter of the implants, surgical technique, prosthetic rehabilitation, success rate, complications, and patient satisfaction. Sixteen studies were included, with a total of 941 zygomatic implants placed in 486 patients. The follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 120 months. Three different surgical techniques were used to place zygomatic implants: intrasinus implants with the classic sinus window technique, the sinus slot technique, and extrasinus zygomatic implants. The most common restoration used was fixed prosthesis, with either delayed loading after 3-6 months (89%-100% success) or immediate loading (96.37%-100% success). The weighted average success rate was 97.05%, and the most frequent complication was maxillary sinusitis. The general level of patient satisfaction was high. Zygomatic implants have a high success rate and constitute a suitable alternative to treat severe posterior maxillary atrophy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Candel-Martí, E., Carrillo-García, C., Peñarrocha-Oltra, D., & Peñarrocha-Diago, M. (2012, October). Rehabilitation of atrophic posterior maxilla with zygomatic implants: Review. Journal of Oral Implantology. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00126

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free