Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on NASA for fault prediction

8Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this study, empirical analysis is carried out to validate Chidamber and Kemerer metrics suite for predicting fault proneness when taking fault severity levels into account. The results, based on KC1 data set from the public NASA repository, indicate that 1) WMC, NOC, LCOM and CBO are reliable metrics for fault-proneness of classes across fault severity in the prediction models built by decision tree method, and 2) only CBO is reliable metrics for fault-proneness of classes across fault severity in the prediction models built by binary logistic regression method. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, F. (2011). Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on NASA for fault prediction. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 201 CCIS, pp. 168–175). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22418-8_25

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free